The Medicine Maker
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Features
    • Interviews
    • Business & Trends
    • Technology & Manufacturing
    • Product Profiles
    • White Papers

    Featured Topics

    • Biopharma
    • Small Molecules
    • Cell & Gene
    • Future of Pharma

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
    • Cell and Gene Therapy Supplement
  • Topics

    Topics

    • Cell & Gene
    • Bioprocessing
    • Drug Delivery
    • Drug Discovery
    • Development & Clinical
    • Formulation
    • Facilities & Equipment
    • Outsourcing
    • Packaging
    • Regulation & Standards
    • Small Molecules
    • Supply Chain
  • News & Blogs

    News & Blogs

    • Industry News
    • Research News
    • Blogs
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community & Awards

    Community & Awards

    • Power List
    • Sitting Down With
    • Innovation Awards
    • Company of the Year Awards
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • eBooks
    • Content Hubs
Subscribe
Subscribe
The Medicine Maker / Issues / 2017 / Jun / A New Dawn for Real Time Characterization?
Manufacture Facilities & Equipment Technology & Manufacturing Sponsored

A New Dawn for Real Time Characterization?

Advanced tools such as surface plasmon resonance offer scientists a deeper understanding of their biotherapeutics – and unlock the potential for better products for patients.

By Robert Karlsson 06/21/2017 1 min read

Sponsored By

Share

In my last article (1), I discussed the benefits of surface plasmon resonance (SPR). As a quick recap, SPR has been around for over 25 years and, in particular, has become a popular method for characterizing biotherapeutics and biosimilars. SPR is label-free, allows for real-time analysis and can characterize binding in terms of kinetics and affinity. In this article, I will explain in more detail some specific examples of how SPR can be used. Biopharmaceuticals are far more complex than defined chemical drugs, so analytical tools that provide in-depth understanding of how upstream and downstream processes can affect the critical quality attributes (CQAs) of a product are crucial for developing an effective bioprocess control strategy. In the early stages of biopharma development, the focus is often on kinetic analysis, but in later phases, where the manufacturing process is in place, analysis can be simplified. Here, it is important to demonstrate that the drug substance and drug product maintain binding properties, and to determine drug potency to ensure correct dosage. For this purpose, kinetic analysis can be replaced with dose response curves. By comparison with a reference batch, the relative potency can be estimated from median effective concentration values (EC50) or by parallel line analysis (PLA). The output from EC50 analysis or PLA is a concentration. However, EC50 values can also shift because of changes in binding kinetics. To establish more conclusive dose comparisons, GE Healthcare has developed Biacore software that enables direct comparison with established kinetic profiles in a way that avoids kinetic modeling and determination of rate constants. By combining the information obtained from dose response curves and sensorgram comparison, more stringent batch-to-batch comparisons can be obtained than when only using dose response curves. Data for dose response curves and sensorgram comparison can readily be obtained in a single experiment. To cover all CQAs, an array of potency assays may be required – an aspect recently discussed by researchers from Roche, who developed Biacore assays for their bispecific CrossMab (2). The assay is based on a bridging format that enables you to look at binding of the antibody to two different antigen specificities in a single sensorgram. The final readout, reported as a single response, represents the relative amount of CrossMab molecules that simultaneously bind both antigens.

Though the Biacore assay format is flexible, pitfalls can arise when applying a bridging assay (for example, a change of antigen activity upon immobilization), so the same team developed an alternative SPR-based assay that allowed individual assessment of both targets in solution (3). Comparison of data from the two assays showed that simultaneous binding can be calculated based on both individual readouts and revealed a good correlation. Hence, the SPR-based assay principles enabled “full” functional analysis of a bispecific CrossMab in only one assay.  SPR is also commonly used for biosimilar development to compare the biosimilar with the approved reference product. Indeed, SPR is even mentioned specifically in FDA biosimilar guidelines. Other techniques, including liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis, are often used in biosimilar development, but they only provide structural information, whereas SPR can be used for functional studies to characterize and compare target and effector function of the biosimilar to that of the reference product. Functional studies are further used to investigate whether subtle changes in higher order protein structure or glycosylation patterns impact antigen or Fc-Receptor binding. Our Biacore systems are applied in drug discovery, but also increasingly in early development and production, replacing traditional ELISA-based methods and some cell-based assays. In June 2016, we introduced our next generation of Biacore SPR systems. Biacore 8K is a highly sensitive, eight-needle parallel SPR system to boost operational efficiency throughout drug discovery, development and manufacturing. Having been involved in the development of Biacore systems for more than 30 years, it’s no surprise that I’m passionate about their potential. Users are continuously pushing the boundaries of SPR as they seek to better understand their molecules and to develop better products for patients. We are not standing by idly and I expect the technology to continue to advance in leaps and bounds. Robert Karlsson is staff scientist in the Purification and Analysis team at GE Healthcare Life Sciences.

Newsletters

Receive the latest pharmaceutical news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. R Karlsson, “Bringing Time Back to Biology,” The Medicine Maker, 29, (2017). Available at: http://bit.ly/2qPtgfe C Gassnera et al., “Development and validation of a novel SPR-based assay principle for bispecific molecules,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 102, 144–149 (2015). PMID: 25277666 W. Meschendoerfera et al., “SPR-based assays enable the full functional analysis of bispecificmolecules,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 132, 141–147 (2017). PMID: 27721070

About the Author(s)

Robert Karlsson

Robert Karlsson is Staff Scientist in the Purification and analysis team at GE Healthcare Life Sciences.

More Articles by Robert Karlsson

Recommended

Related Content

Illuminating the “Dark Regions” of the Genome
Facilities & Equipment Technology & Manufacturing
Illuminating the “Dark Regions” of the Genome

April 3, 2025

5 min read

Many clinically important genes are located in the “dark” regions of the human genome – and some scientists believe they could be the key to understanding the relationship between our genetic makeup and diseases.

The Next Decade of Cell and Gene Therapies
Cell & Gene Bioprocessing Biopharma
The Next Decade of Cell and Gene Therapies

April 2, 2025

5 min read

Off-the-shelf allogeneic CAR-Ts, increased manufacturing productivity led by digital systems, and more; we ask experts about the future of advanced medicine.

AI, Big Data, and Digital Disruption
Facilities & Equipment Development & Clinical Future of Pharma
AI, Big Data, and Digital Disruption

March 31, 2025

7 min read

An industry survey looks at changing attitudes and challenges in digital innovation for clinical research. Uptake is slow but steady.

Building a Resilient CGT Workforce
Cell & Gene Outsourcing Technology & Manufacturing
Building a Resilient CGT Workforce

March 26, 2025

3 min read

With competition for skilled employees in cell and gene therapy manufacturing high, companies need to ensure they are investing in training and mentorship.

The Medicine Maker
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions: